How We Test

Why Our Review Process Exists

Most SEO agencies sell you a generic checklist. We sell operational reality. Las Vegas is a brutal market for local search. You are fighting proximity signals against massive casinos, transient tourist traffic, and aggressive competitors.

We built this testing protocol to cut the noise.

Business owners waste thousands of dollars on broken software and outdated tactics. They buy citation packages that never index. They pay for review software that their customers ignore. We stop that cycle.

We find what actually moves the needle in the local map pack. We test it. We document it. We publish it.

How We Select What To Cover

We look at the friction points local businesses face every day. We ignore theoretical updates. We focus on the trenches. If a new review management platform claims to filter out spam, we put it in our queue.

We select subjects based on client necessity. We prioritize tools that handle duplicate listings, review velocity tracking, and local grid rank tracking. We reject anything that looks like a vanity metric dashboard.

Our Evaluation Criteria

We do not read press releases. We build dummy Google Business Profiles, or we use our own staging sites. We run the software. We track the grid.

First, we measure proximity expansion. We use tools like Local Falcon or BrightLocal to see if a tactic pushes your ranking radius past a two-mile limit. We want to see if your business shows up for users standing three miles away. If the radius stays static, the tactic is useless.

Second, we audit citation indexing speed. We submit data to data aggregators like Yext or Whitespark. We wait. We count exactly how many directories index the NAP data within 14 days. We penalize tools that create messy duplicate listings.

Third, we track review velocity impact. We measure how fast new reviews correlate with map pack movement. We test the SMS request features of reputation management platforms. We track the conversion rate from text message to published Google review.